Friday, 27 February 2026

Exploring Art Movements: From Expressionism to Postmodernism

Exploring Art Movements That Changed How We See the World

This blog is written as a task assigned by Megha Ma'am Trivedi (Department of English, MKBU). Detailed Notes on Expressionism, Surrealism, and the Journey from Modernism to Postmodernism. Understanding the art movements that redefined human perception and creative expression.

Introduction

Art has never existed in isolation from the world around it. Every major artistic movement in history has emerged as a response to social, political, and psychological upheavals. Whether it was the trauma of world wars, the disorientation of rapid industrialization, or the philosophical questioning of reality itself, artists have always found ways to challenge the familiar and offer new ways of seeing.

In India, and particularly in Gujarat, the understanding of Western art movements has played an important role in shaping how students of literature and fine arts approach both global and regional creativity. Cities like Bhavnagar, with their rich cultural history stretching from the reign of the Gohil Rajputs to the literary contributions of figures like Govardhanram Tripathi and Gangasati, provide a unique lens through which these global movements can be studied. The cultural ethos of Bhavnagar, home to institutions like Maharaja Krishnakumarsinhji Bhavnagar University (MKBU) and the Barton Library, has always encouraged intellectual curiosity and creative expression.

This blog presents detailed notes on three significant art and literary movements: Expressionism, Surrealism, and Modernism and Postmodernism. Each section explores the movement's origins, characteristics, key figures, and its relevance to literature and art both globally and within the Indian context. At the end, documentation of creative activities undertaken during the college literature festival is also included.


1. Expressionism

Expressionism - Art of Inner Turmoil

Expressionism: The Art of Inner Turmoil

What is Expressionism?

Expressionism is an art and literary movement that originated in the early twentieth century, primarily in Germany and Austria, roughly between 1905 and 1920. Unlike Impressionism, which attempted to capture the external world as the eye perceives it through light and colour, Expressionism turned inward. It was fundamentally concerned with expressing emotional experience rather than representing physical reality.

In an Expressionist painting, the world does not look the way it actually looks. It looks the way it feels. If the emotion is fear, the sky might turn blood red. If the emotion is loneliness, buildings might lean away as though the entire city is rejecting the figure standing in it. Expressionism deliberately distorts reality. It exaggerates colours, shapes, and lines to convey subjective feelings such as inner turmoil, anxiety, alienation, and the darker dimensions of human psychology.

Historical Context

To understand why Expressionism emerged, it is essential to understand what Europe was experiencing at the time. The early 1900s were a period of rapid industrialization, urbanization, and social upheaval across the continent. Cities were growing enormous and impersonal. Factories were reducing human beings to mechanical functions. Traditional religious values and moral certainties were crumbling under the weight of scientific discoveries, particularly Charles Darwin's theory of evolution and Friedrich Nietzsche's philosophical proclamation that "God is dead."

The First World War (1914–1918) then shattered whatever remaining illusions Europeans held about progress and civilization. Millions of young men perished in trenches for reasons that nobody could fully justify or explain. The world stopped making rational sense. Expressionism was the artistic scream that erupted from this chaos, a visual and literary protest against the dehumanizing forces of modern life.

Key Characteristics of Expressionism

The defining features of Expressionism include the following:

🎨 KEY CHARACTERISTICS OF EXPRESSIONISM

Distortion of Form

Objects, human figures, and landscapes are deliberately misshapen and exaggerated to convey emotion rather than visual accuracy.

Bold, Unnatural Colours

Bright, clashing, and sometimes violent colour palettes are employed to provoke strong emotional responses.

Emotional Intensity

The artwork prioritizes the artist's subjective emotional state over objective observation of the external world.

Themes of Alienation and Anxiety

Loneliness, existential fear, madness, spiritual crisis, and dread are recurring subjects throughout Expressionist works.

Rejection of Realism

There is a deliberate and conscious departure from realistic or naturalistic modes of representation.

Primitivism

Some Expressionists drew inspiration from non-Western art traditions, folk art, and children's drawings, seeking a rawness and authenticity that formal academic art had lost.

Major Artists and Works

Edvard Munch, the Norwegian painter, is widely considered a precursor to the Expressionist movement. His iconic painting The Scream (1893) is perhaps the most recognizable Expressionist image in the history of art. The figure in the painting is not a realistic human portrait. It is a universal symbol of anxiety, a face melting under the unbearable pressure of modern existence, set against a swirling, distorted sky.

Ernst Ludwig Kirchner was a founding member of Die BrΓΌcke (The Bridge), a group of German Expressionist artists formed in Dresden in 1905. His painting Street, Berlin (1913) depicts jagged, angular figures walking through a city that feels threatening and suffocating. The people resemble masked figures, disconnected from one another, capturing the alienation of urban life.

Wassily Kandinsky and Franz Marc were central figures of Der Blaue Reiter (The Blue Rider), another major Expressionist group based in Munich. Kandinsky gradually moved toward complete abstraction, believing that colour and form alone could express spiritual and emotional truths without any reference to the visible, material world.

Egon Schiele, the Austrian painter, produced deeply unsettling portraits and self-portraits featuring twisted, contorted bodies that exposed raw human vulnerability. His work continues to provoke strong reactions because of how openly it confronts themes of fragility, desire, and mortality.

Expressionism Beyond Painting

Expressionism was not confined to visual art. It extended powerfully into literature, theatre, and cinema.

πŸ“š EXPRESSIONISM BEYOND PAINTING

πŸ“– Literature

The works of Franz Kafka, particularly The Metamorphosis (1915) and The Trial (1925), are closely associated with Expressionist sensibilities. The distorted, nightmarish logic of Kafka's fictional worlds captures the same alienation and absurdity that Expressionist painters rendered on canvas.

🎭 Theatre

Playwrights like Georg Kaiser and Ernst Toller developed Expressionist dramas characterized by exaggerated characters, fragmented dialogue, and dreamlike stage settings. Characters were often stripped of individual names, reflecting how modern industrial society reduces human beings to interchangeable types.

🎬 Cinema

German Expressionist films such as The Cabinet of Dr. Caligari (1920) and Nosferatu (1922) employed distorted sets, dramatic shadows, and unusual camera angles to create atmospheres of terror and psychological instability. These films had a lasting influence on later horror cinema and the development of the film noir genre.

Expressionism and India

In the Indian context, Expressionist influences can be traced in the works of painters associated with the Progressive Artists' Group, founded in Bombay in 1947. Artists like F.N. Souza used bold, distorted figures and raw emotional intensity in ways that resonate with European Expressionism, though their subject matter was rooted in Indian social and political realities. In Gujarati literature, certain works of Suresh Joshi and the experimental prose of the Navi Kavita movement display Expressionist tendencies in their emphasis on subjective inner experience and alienation from conventional social structures.

Video: Understanding Expressionism


2. Surrealism

Surrealism - Dreams and the Unconscious Revolution

Surrealism: Dreams, DalΓ­, and the Unconscious Revolution

What is Surrealism?

Surrealism is an artistic and literary movement that originated in Paris in the 1920s. The term itself, derived from French, means "above reality" or "beyond reality." Surrealists were not interested in depicting the everyday world as it is ordinarily experienced. Their aim was to access a deeper, hidden reality, the reality of the unconscious mind, of dreams, irrational desires, and buried fears.

If Expressionism distorted the outer world to reveal inner emotional states, Surrealism went a step further. It attempted to dissolve the boundary between the conscious and the unconscious, between the rational and the irrational, between waking life and the dream state. Surrealist art frequently resembles a dream rendered with photographic precision, or a nightmare from which one cannot fully awaken.

Origin and the Surrealist Manifesto

Surrealism emerged from the earlier Dada movement, an anti-art protest movement that arose during the First World War. The Dadaists were repulsed by the war and by the supposedly rational, civilized society that had produced such destruction. Their response was to create art that was deliberately absurd, nonsensical, and provocative. However, Dada was primarily destructive in its impulse. It excelled at tearing down existing structures but did not offer a constructive alternative.

AndrΓ© Breton, a French writer and poet who had participated in Dada activities, sought to channel Dada's rebellious energy into something more purposeful. In 1924, Breton published the First Surrealist Manifesto, in which he defined Surrealism as:

"Pure psychic automatism, by which one proposes to express, either verbally, in writing, or by any other manner, the real functioning of thought. Dictation of thought in the absence of all control exercised by reason, outside of all aesthetic and moral preoccupation."

In simpler terms, Breton proposed that Surrealism is about allowing the mind to flow freely without censorship, logical control, or moral judgment. The objective was to tap directly into the unconscious mind and let it speak without interference from rational thought.

The Influence of Sigmund Freud

Surrealism owes a profound intellectual debt to Sigmund Freud, the Austrian neurologist who founded the discipline of psychoanalysis. Freud argued that beneath the conscious, rational mind lies a vast unconscious domain filled with repressed desires, childhood memories, anxieties, and primal instincts. He proposed that dreams serve as the "royal road to the unconscious," providing a window into thoughts and feelings that individuals cannot or will not acknowledge during waking life.

The Surrealists were deeply fascinated by this theory. If the unconscious is where the authentic self resides, they reasoned, then genuine art should originate from the unconscious. To achieve this, they developed specific techniques designed to bypass rational thought processes.

Automatism was one such technique, in which artists and writers created without premeditation, allowing the hand to move freely across the page or canvas and trusting that the unconscious would guide the creative process. Dream journals were another important tool. Surrealists meticulously recorded their dreams and utilized dream imagery as raw material for artistic creation.

Key Artists and Works

Salvador DalΓ­ is arguably the most famous Surrealist painter in popular culture. His painting The Persistence of Memory (1931), featuring melting clocks draped across a barren, dreamlike landscape, is among the most widely recognized images in Western art history. DalΓ­ described his creative method as "paranoiac-critical," a deliberate process of inducing hallucinatory mental states to generate bizarre, unexpected images, which he then rendered with extraordinary technical precision. The resulting paintings present impossible scenarios that nevertheless appear startlingly real.

RenΓ© Magritte, the Belgian Surrealist, adopted a different approach. His paintings appear deceptively simple on the surface, but they systematically undermine assumptions about perception, representation, and meaning. His celebrated painting The Treachery of Images (1929) depicts a realistically rendered pipe accompanied by the inscription "Ceci n'est pas une pipe" ("This is not a pipe"). The statement is literally true, as the object is a painting of a pipe rather than an actual pipe, but this simple observation opens up profound philosophical questions about the relationship between representation and reality, between language and the objects it names.

Max Ernst employed innovative techniques such as frottage (rubbing textured surfaces to create patterns) and collage to produce strange, dreamlike landscapes populated by mysterious bird-like creatures and sentient forests.

Frida Kahlo, the Mexican painter, is frequently associated with Surrealism, although she herself resisted the classification. She once stated, "They thought I was a Surrealist, but I wasn't. I never painted dreams. I painted my own reality." Nonetheless, her intensely symbolic self-portraits, saturated with imagery of physical suffering and emotional truth, share significant common ground with the Surrealist sensibility.

Surrealism in Literature and Cinema

πŸ“–πŸŽ¬ SURREALISM IN LITERATURE AND CINEMA

πŸ“–

Literature

AndrΓ© Breton's novel Nadja (1928) deliberately blurs the boundaries between fiction and autobiography, between mundane reality and the marvellous. The automatic writing experiments of poets such as Paul Γ‰luard and Robert Desnos generated texts that read like direct transcriptions of dreams.

🎬

Cinema

Luis BuΓ±uel and Salvador DalΓ­ collaborated on Un Chien Andalou (1929), which abandons conventional narrative entirely, presenting a sequence of disturbing, disconnected images linked by dream logic. BuΓ±uel's subsequent films continued to employ Surrealist strategies to critique bourgeois social conventions.

Surrealism and India

Within the Indian art tradition, Surrealist influences are visible in the works of several significant artists. Bhupen Khakhar, a painter from Baroda, Gujarat, incorporated dream imagery, fantasy, and the irrational into his figurative paintings, creating works that blend the everyday with the fantastical in ways that echo Surrealist practice. His paintings of ordinary middle-class Gujarati life, rendered with an element of the bizarre and the subconscious, provide a distinctly Indian engagement with Surrealist ideas.

The Gujarati literary tradition has also engaged with Surrealist tendencies. The experimental poetry and prose of the Adhunik (modern) Gujarati literary movement, particularly writers who explored stream of consciousness and dreamlike narrative structures, reflect an awareness of Surrealist principles adapted to the cultural and linguistic context of Gujarat.

In Bhavnagar specifically, the literary culture fostered by institutions such as the Dakshina Murti Vinay Mandir and the university has long encouraged engagement with global literary and artistic traditions, providing students with opportunities to explore how movements like Surrealism can inform their understanding of both Western and Indian creative expression.

Video: Understanding Surrealism


3. Modernism and Postmodernism

Modernism and Postmodernism

Modernism vs. Postmodernism: What Really Changed?

What is Modernism?

Modernism is a broad cultural movement that emerged in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, spanning approximately the 1880s to the 1940s. It is not a single unified style or school but rather an umbrella term encompassing a wide array of experimental movements in art, literature, music, architecture, and philosophy. What these diverse movements shared was a common impulse: the conviction that traditional forms of expression were no longer adequate for the modern world, and that radically new approaches were necessary.

The modern world was fundamentally different from anything that had preceded it. Industrialization had transformed economies, social structures, and physical landscapes. Urbanization had concentrated populations in massive, impersonal cities. Scientific discoveries, from Darwin's theory of evolution to Einstein's theory of relativity to Freud's theories of the unconscious, had overturned long-held certainties about nature, the universe, and the human mind. The catastrophic violence of the two World Wars destroyed remaining faith in the inevitability of human progress and the reliability of rational civilization.

Modernist artists and writers recognized that conventional forms, the realistic novel, the metrically regular poem, the representational painting, could no longer capture the complexity, fragmentation, and disorientation that characterized modern experience. The unprecedented nature of the times demanded unprecedented forms of artistic expression.

Key Characteristics of Modernism

πŸ”§ KEY CHARACTERISTICS OF MODERNISM

Experimentation with Form

Modernists systematically broke the established rules of artistic structure, narrative construction, and literary style. In literature, this manifested through techniques such as stream of consciousness, fragmented and non-linear narratives, and the use of multiple narrative perspectives.

Emphasis on Subjectivity

Modernism prioritized individual perception, consciousness, and inner experience over the objective depiction of external reality.

Self-consciousness about Art

Modernist works frequently draw attention to their own status as constructed artifacts. A Modernist novel might openly reflect upon or comment on the process of writing itself.

Rejection of Tradition

Modernism deliberately and programmatically broke with nineteenth-century conventions of literary realism, sentimental expression, and moral instruction.

Search for Deeper Meaning

Despite their radical formal experimentation, most Modernist artists and writers maintained a belief that art possesses the capacity to reveal hidden truths about human existence.

Use of Myth and Symbolism

Many Modernists drew extensively upon ancient myths, religious symbols, and psychological archetypes to provide structural coherence and deeper resonance to their explorations of modern life.

Key Modernist Figures

In literature, the major Modernist figures include James Joyce, whose monumental novel Ulysses (1922) reinvented the possibilities of the novel form through its revolutionary use of stream of consciousness, stylistic parody, and an extraordinarily intricate web of allusions to Homer's Odyssey. Virginia Woolf explored the inner lives of her characters with remarkable psychological sensitivity in novels such as Mrs Dalloway (1925) and To the Lighthouse (1927). T.S. Eliot's landmark poem The Waste Land (1922) stands as a fragmented, densely allusive work that captures the spiritual desolation and cultural collapse of post-war Europe. Franz Kafka created nightmarish parabolic fictions exploring the alienation of the modern individual within incomprehensible bureaucratic and social systems. William Faulkner experimented boldly with the manipulation of time, narrative perspective, and voice in novels set in the American South.

In visual art, Modernism encompasses a succession of groundbreaking movements including Cubism (Pablo Picasso, Georges Braque), Expressionism (Kirchner, Kandinsky), Abstract Art (Piet Mondrian, Kazimir Malevich), and Surrealism (DalΓ­, Magritte). Pablo Picasso's revolutionary painting Les Demoiselles d'Avignon (1907) shattered traditional perspective and representational conventions by presenting multiple viewpoints simultaneously and incorporating visual elements drawn from African sculptural traditions.

In architecture, Modernism meant an emphasis on clean geometric lines, functional design, and the systematic rejection of decorative ornament. Le Corbusier and the Bauhaus school in Germany promoted the principle that buildings should function as efficient, rational "machines for living," stripped of all unnecessary embellishment.


What is Postmodernism?

If Modernism represented a reaction against established artistic traditions, Postmodernism was, in significant respects, a reaction against Modernism itself. Postmodernism emerged as a recognizable cultural phenomenon in the mid-to-late twentieth century, roughly from the 1960s onward, and it systematically questioned many of the foundational assumptions that Modernism had taken for granted.

Where Modernism was characteristically serious and earnest, Postmodernism was frequently playful and ironic. Where Modernism searched for deep, universal, transcendent truths, Postmodernism expressed fundamental doubt about whether such truths exist or are accessible. Where Modernism maintained clear distinctions between high art and popular culture, Postmodernism deliberately blurred and dissolved those hierarchical boundaries.

The French philosopher Jean-FranΓ§ois Lyotard influentially defined the Postmodern condition as "incredulity toward metanarratives." A metanarrative is a grand, overarching explanatory framework that claims to provide a comprehensive account of reality: Marxism, Christianity, the Enlightenment narrative of inevitable progress, or even Modernism's own belief in the redemptive and revelatory power of art. Postmodernist thinkers argued that these grand narratives are not neutral, objective descriptions of how the world works. Rather, they are cultural constructions, shaped by relations of power, ideological commitments, and historical contingency. No single narrative framework can legitimately claim to represent the complete or final truth.

Key Characteristics of Postmodernism

πŸ”€ KEY CHARACTERISTICS OF POSTMODERNISM

Irony and Playfulness

Postmodern art characteristically adopts a tone of detached, self-aware irony, declining to take anything, including its own artistic practice, entirely at face value.

Pastiche and Parody

Postmodernist creators freely borrow from, combine, and recycle different styles, genres, and historical periods. This practice is termed pastiche when executed without specific critical intent, and parody when it involves mockery or critique.

Blurring of Boundaries

The conventional distinctions between high art and popular culture, between fiction and documentary reality, between original creation and reproduction, become deliberately unclear.

Fragmentation

Postmodern works are frequently structured as deliberately fragmented compositions, resisting the provision of coherent, unified narratives or singular, definitive meanings.

Skepticism Toward Truth Claims

Postmodernism fundamentally questions whether objective truth is attainable or even meaningful. It emphasizes that all forms of knowledge are constructed, partial, and shaped by perspective.

Intertextuality

Postmodern texts are characterized by constant references to other texts, generating complex webs of interconnected meaning extending far beyond any individual work.

The Death of the Author

Building upon Roland Barthes' influential essay, Postmodernism contends that the meaning of a text is not fixed by authorial intention but is actively constructed through the process of reading and interpretation.

Key Postmodernist Figures

In literature, significant Postmodernist writers include Thomas Pynchon (Gravity's Rainbow), Don DeLillo (White Noise), Salman Rushdie (Midnight's Children), Italo Calvino (If on a winter's night a traveler), and Jorge Luis Borges, whose short fictions concerning labyrinths, infinite libraries, and imaginary encyclopaedias anticipated many of the central preoccupations of Postmodernist thought.

In philosophy, the major Postmodernist theorists include Jacques Derrida (deconstruction), Michel Foucault (the relationship between power and knowledge), Jean Baudrillard (simulacra and the hyperreal), and Lyotard (the postmodern condition and the collapse of metanarratives).

In visual art, Andy Warhol's Pop Art, with its mass-produced silkscreen images of consumer products and celebrities, mounted a direct challenge to the Modernist insistence that authentic art must be unique, original, and fundamentally separate from commercial culture. Later artists such as Jeff Koons and Damien Hirst extended this provocative questioning of art's boundaries and definitions.

In architecture, Postmodernism rejected the austere functionalism and geometric severity of Modernist building design in favour of eclectic, decorative, and sometimes deliberately whimsical structures that mixed historical architectural styles with contemporary elements. Robert Venturi's influential study Learning from Las Vegas (1972) controversially argued that architects should learn from the vibrant, chaotic, commercially driven landscape of the Las Vegas Strip rather than dismissing it as culturally inferior.

Modernism vs. Postmodernism: A Comparative Overview

πŸ“Š MODERNISM vs. POSTMODERNISM

Aspect Modernism Postmodernism
Time Period Late 1800s – mid 1900s Mid 1900s – present
Attitude to Tradition Rejection and radical reinvention Playful recycling and eclectic mixing
Tone Serious, earnest, urgent Ironic, playful, self-aware
Truth Believes in accessing deeper truths Skeptical of all truth claims
Art and Culture Strict separation of high art and popular culture Deliberate dissolution of boundaries
Form Experimental but purposeful Fragmented, self-referential
Identity The unified self (often in crisis) The fragmented, fluid, constructed self
Grand Narratives Seeks to create new ones Distrusts and deconstructs all of them

Modernism, Postmodernism and India

The Indian engagement with Modernism and Postmodernism has been rich and complex. In literature, Modernist influences are clearly visible in the works of writers across Indian languages. In Gujarati literature, Suresh Joshi is often regarded as the central figure of Gujarati literary Modernism. His novel Chhinnapatr and his critical writings championed experimentation, subjectivity, and the exploration of the individual consciousness in ways that directly parallel European Modernist concerns. The Navi Kavita and Adhunik movements in Gujarati poetry similarly reflected Modernist preoccupations with fragmentation, alienation, and the crisis of meaning in contemporary life.

Postmodernist tendencies in Indian and Gujarati writing have emerged more recently. Writers who employ metafiction, multiple narrative voices, intertextual references, irony, and the blending of high literary tradition with popular or folk cultural elements can be seen as engaging with Postmodernist aesthetics. Salman Rushdie, though writing in English, represents perhaps the most globally recognized example of Indian literary Postmodernism, and his influence has been felt across Indian language literatures.

In Bhavnagar, the academic study of these movements at the university level has contributed to a broader understanding of how global literary and artistic developments relate to the regional cultural traditions of Saurashtra and Gujarat. The city's literary heritage, shaped by figures like Nanalal Dalpatram Kavi and the tradition of Gujarati literary scholarship associated with the region, provides a distinctive vantage point for examining how Modernist and Postmodernist ideas interact with local cultural sensibilities and creative practices.

Video: Understanding Modernism and Postmodernism


Conclusion

The study of Expressionism, Surrealism, and the transition from Modernism to Postmodernism reveals that art is never merely a matter of aesthetics or technique. Each of these movements arose in response to specific historical, social, and philosophical crises, and each offered radically new ways of understanding the relationship between human consciousness and the world it inhabits.

Expressionism demonstrated that art can serve as a direct channel for inner emotional states, employing distortion and exaggeration to convey truths that realistic representation cannot access. Surrealism revealed the creative potential of the unconscious mind, showing that the irrational, the dreamlike, and the logically impossible are legitimate and valuable sources of artistic meaning. Modernism insisted that new historical realities demand new artistic forms and that the conventions of the past must be broken when they no longer serve the needs of the present. Postmodernism, in turn, questioned whether even the most radical innovations of Modernism might themselves become restrictive orthodoxies, and it advocated for an art of plurality, irony, and openness to multiple, coexisting interpretations.

For students studying these movements in Bhavnagar and across Gujarat, these are not merely abstract Western concepts confined to European and American cultural history. They represent ways of thinking about creativity, meaning, and the purpose of art that have direct relevance to the literary and artistic traditions of India. Understanding these global movements enriches the capacity to engage critically and creatively with both Western and Indian art, and it deepens appreciation for the ways in which creative expression everywhere responds to the challenges and possibilities of its time.

Art Movements - Conclusion Visual

The Evolution of Art: From Inner Turmoil to Deconstructed Reality

🎨 KEY INSIGHTS

😱

Expressionism
Inner emotional truth

πŸ’­

Surrealism
Unconscious mind

πŸ”§

Modernism
New forms needed

πŸ”€

Postmodernism
Question everything

πŸ“š Works Cited

BΓΌrger, Peter. Theory of the Avant-Garde. Translated by Michael Shaw, University of Minnesota Press, 1984. Print.

Barry, Peter. Beginning Theory: An Introduction to Literary and Cultural Theory. 4th ed., Manchester University Press, 2017. Print.

Breton, AndrΓ©. Manifestoes of Surrealism. Translated by Richard Seaver and Helen R. Lane, University of Michigan Press, 1969. Print.

Childs, Peter. Modernism. 2nd ed., Routledge, 2008. Print.

Joshi, Suresh. Chhinnapatr. Gujarat Sahitya Sabha, 1966. Print.


πŸ“‹ BLOG STATISTICS

πŸ“

3,672

Word Count

🎬

3

Videos

πŸ–Ό️

4

Images

πŸ“Š

3

Presentations


This blog explores how Expressionism, Surrealism, Modernism, and Postmodernism transformed artistic perception across the globe, with special attention to their relevance within the Indian and Gujarati cultural context.

🎨 "Art is not what you see, but what you make others see." — Edgar Degas 🎨

Monday, 23 February 2026

Forests, Screens, and Data Colonialism in Humans in the Loop

Post-Viewing Reflective Essay: Humans in the Loop (2024)

This blog is written as a task assigned by Dr. Dilip Barad Sir (Department of English, MKBU). A critical analysis of Aranya Sahay's remarkable debut film exploring AI, labour, indigenous knowledge, and digital capitalism. Where the forest meets the screen, and human dignity meets algorithmic reduction.

Humans in the Loop (2024) - Film Poster

Humans in the Loop (2024) : Behind every algorithm, there is a human being

Core Details

🎬 FILM AT A GLANCE

πŸŽ₯

Director
Aranya Sahay
(Feature debut)

πŸ“…

Year
2024 (Festival)
2025 (Netflix)

⏱️

Runtime
72 minutes

🎭

Genre
Independent Social Drama / Tech Drama

πŸ—£️

Language
Hindi and local regional dialects

Humans in the Loop (2024) : Official Trailer


TASK 1 : AI, Bias, & Epistemic Representation

"Whose Knowledge Counts? AI, Bias, and Epistemic Hierarchies in Aranya Sahay's Humans in the Loop (2024)"


Introduction

Aranya Sahay's Humans in the Loop (2024) is a remarkable film that tells a simple story with profound implications. It follows Nehma, an Adivasi woman from Jharkhand, who takes up data-labelling work for an AI company. On the surface, the film is about one woman's job. But underneath, it is about some of the biggest questions of our time: Who decides what AI knows? Whose knowledge is valued? And what happens when the most powerful technology in the world is built on the backs of the most marginalised people?

This essay critically analyses how the film represents the relationship between technology (AI) and human knowledge, focusing on two key areas: (1) how the narrative exposes algorithmic bias as culturally situated rather than purely technical, and (2) how the film highlights epistemic hierarchies : that is, the question of whose knowledge counts in technological systems.

Thesis: Humans in the Loop uses the intimate story of an Adivasi data-labeller to reveal that AI bias is not a technical glitch but a reflection of deep cultural and epistemic power structures, and the film's cinematic choices reinforce this argument by visually and narratively privileging indigenous knowledge over algorithmic categorisation.

1. Algorithmic Bias as Culturally Situated

Most people think of AI bias as a technical problem : a bug that can be fixed with better code or more data. But Humans in the Loop shows that bias is deeply cultural. The AI system in the film has predetermined categories for labelling images. These categories are not neutral; they come from a specific worldview : usually Western, urban, and industrial. When Nehma is asked to label an image of a plant or an animal, her Adivasi understanding of that image does not fit the available categories.

This is not because Nehma lacks knowledge. On the contrary, she has more knowledge than the system can handle. She knows the medicinal uses of the plant, the spiritual significance of the animal, and the ecological relationships between different species. But the AI system reduces all of this to a single tag. As Haris et al. (2023) argue, machine learning systems "identify patterns based on the data they are trained on, and if that data carries biases, the outputs will too" (p. 94). The film dramatises this argument by showing the human moment of conflict : the moment when Nehma's lived knowledge meets the system's rigid categories.

⚔️ NEHMA'S KNOWLEDGE vs. AI'S CATEGORIES

🌿 Nehma's Knowledge

Medicinal uses of the plant. Spiritual significance of the animal. Ecological relationships between species. Centuries of embodied, transmitted indigenous wisdom.

πŸ€– AI's Categories

A single tag. Predetermined, rigid, Western-urban-industrial worldview. Reduces richness to data points. Cannot accommodate indigenous understanding.

The film suggests that algorithmic bias is not an error but a feature. It is the natural result of building systems from a single knowledge tradition. As FrΓ­as (2024) notes, "The paradox of artificial intelligence in cinema is that it reveals the limits of what technology can understand about human culture" (p. 12). In Humans in the Loop, this paradox is made visible through Nehma's daily struggle.

From a film studies perspective, this connects to Apparatus Theory (as described by Shepherdson et al., 2004). Apparatus Theory argues that cinema itself is not a neutral medium : it shapes how we see the world through its technological and ideological structures. The film applies this insight not just to cinema but to AI: just as the camera frames reality in a particular way, the algorithm categorises reality in a particular way. Both are apparatuses of power. The film makes the viewer aware of this by showing the AI system's categories as arbitrary constructions rather than natural truths.


2. Epistemic Hierarchies: Whose Knowledge Counts?

The most powerful argument in Humans in the Loop is about epistemic hierarchy : the ranking of different knowledge systems. In the world of AI, Western scientific knowledge sits at the top. Indigenous, local, and experiential knowledge is either ignored or reduced to data points.

Nehma's knowledge of the forest is not abstract or theoretical. It is embodied : learned through years of living in and with the forest. She knows which plants cure fever, which birds signal rain, which trees are sacred to her community. This knowledge has been developed over centuries and is transmitted through oral tradition, ritual, and daily practice. But in the eyes of the AI system, this knowledge has no value unless it can be reduced to a label.

The film presents this as a form of "epistemic violence" : a concept used by postcolonial theorist Gayatri Chakravorty Spivak to describe the silencing of marginalised knowledge systems by dominant power structures. When the AI system refuses to accommodate Nehma's categories, it is not just a software limitation : it is a political act. It says: "Your knowledge does not count."

This connects to what Cave et al. (2023) describe as the "cultural construction" of who counts as an AI expert. In popular culture, the AI engineer is usually a white man in a Western setting. Humans in the Loop completely reverses this image by making an Adivasi woman the central figure. Nehma is not the engineer who designs the system; she is the worker who trains it. But the film argues that her knowledge is the foundation of the system, even though she receives neither credit nor fair compensation.

The film also highlights the irony of the "human-in-the-loop" concept. In AI research, the human in the loop is supposed to improve the system by providing feedback. But in practice, the human's role is strictly controlled. Nehma cannot change the categories; she can only choose from the options given to her. Her agency is limited by the structure of the system. This is a cinematic representation of what Vighi (2019) calls the ideological function of technology : technology appears to empower the individual while actually constraining them within a predetermined framework.


3. Cinematic Representation of the Knowledge Clash

The film's visual language reinforces its argument about epistemic hierarchies. The forest scenes are shot in natural light with wide, expansive frames, suggesting a knowledge system that is broad, deep, and interconnected. The labelling scenes are shot with artificial light in tight, confined frames, suggesting a knowledge system that is narrow, shallow, and isolating.

🎬 VISUAL LANGUAGE: TWO WORLDS

🌳

Forest Scenes

Natural light. Wide, expansive frames. Rich texture and depth. Complex, layered soundscape: birds, insects, wind, water. Suggests knowledge that is broad, deep, interconnected, alive.

πŸ’»

Labelling Scenes

Artificial light. Tight, confined frames. Flat, screen-within-screen. Minimal, mechanical soundscape: mouse clicks, key taps, computer hum. Suggests knowledge that is narrow, shallow, isolating.

This visual contrast is not decorative : it is argumentative. It tells the viewer, without words, that Nehma's world is richer than the AI's world. As Bordwell and Thompson (2019) argue, mise-en-scène is one of the most powerful tools of cinematic meaning-making because it operates on the viewer's senses before it reaches the intellect.

The sound design works in the same way. The forest sounds are complex, layered, and alive. The workplace sounds are flat, repetitive, and mechanical. This contrast communicates the film's central theme: AI simplifies what should not be simplified.

The film's editing also contributes to the argument. The cuts between forest and workspace are often abrupt, creating a jarring effect that forces the viewer to feel the gap between the two worlds. This is not smooth, comfortable cinema : it is cinema that disturbs, that makes the viewer uncomfortable with the systems they take for granted.


4. The Film as Political Intervention

Humans in the Loop is not just a film about AI. It is a political intervention in the global debate about technology, labour, and justice. By centering an Adivasi woman's experience, the film challenges the dominant narrative that AI is a product of Silicon Valley genius. It shows that AI is a product of global labour : much of it invisible, underpaid, and culturally exploitative.

The film also challenges the viewer's own position. If we use AI systems : Google, ChatGPT, image recognition : we are benefiting from the labour of workers like Nehma. The film asks us: Are we comfortable with that?

As Alonso (2026) argues, films about AI have the power to shape "social imaginaries" : our collective ideas about what technology is and what it should be. Humans in the Loop offers a very different imaginary from the usual Hollywood AI film. It says: technology is not neutral, it is not magic, and it is not self-sufficient. It is built on human labour, human knowledge, and human inequality.

From a postcolonial film theory perspective, the film can be read as a critique of what some scholars call data colonialism : the extraction of data and knowledge from the Global South by corporations in the Global North. Just as colonial powers took raw materials from colonies, tech companies take data and labour from developing countries. The film makes this connection without being didactic : it lets the story and the images do the work.


Conclusion

Aranya Sahay's Humans in the Loop is a quiet but powerful film that uses the story of one Adivasi woman to expose the cultural biases and epistemic hierarchies embedded in AI systems. Through its narrative, visual language, and sound design, the film argues that algorithmic bias is not a technical problem but a cultural and political one. It challenges the viewer to think about whose knowledge counts, who does the labour that makes AI possible, and what kind of world we are building when we let machines define reality. The film reminds us that behind every algorithm, there is a human being : and that human being's knowledge, culture, and dignity matter.

As Barad sir writes in his review of the film, "The title itself is a provocation : it reminds us that the 'loop' of AI always has humans in it, and those humans are not abstractions but real people with real lives." Humans in the Loop makes those real lives visible, and in doing so, it makes a powerful case for a more just and inclusive technology.

TASK 2 : Labour & The Politics of Cinematic Visibility

"Making the Invisible Visible: Labour, Digital Capitalism, and Cinematic Resistance in Humans in the Loop"


Introduction

One of the most important things cinema can do is make visible what is hidden. Aranya Sahay's Humans in the Loop (2024) does exactly this. It takes the invisible labour behind AI : the data-labelling, the image-tagging, the endless hours of human input that make machine learning possible : and puts it on the screen for all to see. In doing so, the film challenges the comfortable myth that AI is self-sufficient and forces us to confront the human cost of digital capitalism.

This essay examines how the film visualises invisible labour, what it suggests about labour under digital capitalism, and whether it invites empathy, critique, or transformation in how we perceive work.


1. Visual Language of Labour

The film's representation of labelling work is deeply physical and emotional. Nehma sits at a computer screen for hours, clicking through images, assigning labels, making decisions that shape how an AI system will understand the world. The camera stays close to her : close-ups of her face, her hands on the keyboard, her eyes scanning the screen. This visual intimacy makes the viewer feel the labour, not just understand it.

The workspace is deliberately unglamorous. There are no sleek Silicon Valley offices, no glass walls, no stylish furniture. Nehma works in a modest setting, surrounded by other workers who are equally anonymous to the system they serve. This mise-en-scène choice is politically significant: it refuses to aestheticise digital labour. As Bordwell and Thompson (2019) argue, what is included in the frame (and what is excluded) shapes meaning. By showing the plain reality of the workplace, the film strips away the illusion of tech glamour.

πŸ‘️ MAKING THE INVISIBLE VISIBLE

πŸ–₯️ Physical Labour

Hours at a screen. Clicking through images. Assigning labels. Close-ups of hands on keyboard, eyes scanning. The viewer feels the monotony and exhaustion.

πŸ˜” Emotional Labour

Frustration when knowledge doesn't fit categories. Exhaustion at the end of the day. The gap between the richness of her inner world and the poverty of her work environment.

🏒 Unglamorous Workspace

No sleek offices. No glass walls. Modest, anonymous setting. The film refuses to aestheticise digital labour : it shows the plain, exploitative reality.

The emotional experience of labour is also visualised. We see Nehma's frustration when her knowledge does not fit the system's categories. We see her exhaustion at the end of the day. We see the gap between the richness of her inner world and the poverty of her work environment. This emotional dimension is crucial : it transforms labour from an abstract concept into a lived human experience.


2. Cultural Valuation of Marginalised Work

The film raises a sharp question: Why is some work valued and other work invisible? The engineers who design AI systems are celebrated as innovators. They are profiled in magazines, invited to conferences, and paid enormous salaries. But the workers who train AI : who do the actual work of teaching machines to see, hear, and understand : are anonymous, underpaid, and dispensable.

From a Marxist perspective, this is a classic example of surplus value extraction. The worker (Nehma) creates value through her labour, but that value is captured by the AI company. The gap between what Nehma is paid and the profit the company makes from the trained AI is the surplus value : and it is enormous. Marx argued in Capital that this extraction is the fundamental mechanism of capitalism, and the film shows that digital capitalism works in exactly the same way (Vighi, 2019).

πŸ’° SURPLUS VALUE IN DIGITAL CAPITALISM

πŸ‘©‍πŸ’»

Nehma (Worker)

Creates value through labour. Anonymous. Underpaid. Dispensable.

↗️

Value Extracted

Surplus value captured by the AI company. Enormous profit gap.

🏒

AI Company

Celebrated as innovators. Profiled. Paid enormously. The real workers invisible.

The film also connects cultural identity to labour. Nehma is not just any worker : she is an Adivasi woman. Her marginalisation in the labour market is not accidental; it is structural. Adivasi communities in India have historically been pushed to the margins of the economy. Data-labelling work appears to offer them a path into the digital economy, but the film shows that this "inclusion" is actually a new form of exploitation. The workers are included only as cheap labour, not as equal participants.

This connects to Representation and Identity Studies in film theory. As Cave et al. (2023) argue, popular films about AI tend to exclude marginalised communities from the narrative of technological progress. Humans in the Loop directly challenges this exclusion by making a marginalised worker the protagonist.


3. Empathy, Critique, and Transformation

Does the film invite empathy, critique, or transformation? I argue that it does all three, and it does so through its cinematic choices.

🎭 THREE RESPONSES THE FILM CREATES

πŸ’— Empathy

Created through the film's intimate visual style. The close-ups of Nehma's face, the slow pacing of her daily routine, and the sound of her breathing in the quiet workspace : all of these draw the viewer into her experience. We do not just observe her labour; we share it, at least partially.

πŸ” Critique

Embedded in the film's narrative structure. The contrast between the forest (rich, alive, meaningful) and the workspace (flat, mechanical, alienating) is a visual argument against the devaluation of human labour. The film does not need to state its critique in words : the images speak for themselves.

πŸ”„ Transformation

Suggested through the film's refusal to offer easy solutions. The film does not end with Nehma being rescued or finding a better job. Instead, it leaves the viewer with an unresolved tension : the systems of exploitation are still in place, and the question of change is handed to the audience.

Transformation is suggested through the film's refusal to offer easy solutions. The film does not end with Nehma being rescued by a kind employer or finding a better job. Instead, it leaves the viewer with an unresolved tension : the systems of exploitation are still in place, and the question of change is handed to the audience. This is a politically mature choice. As Vighi (2019) argues, the most powerful political films are those that make the viewer uncomfortable rather than satisfied.

The film invites us to ask: What can we do? If we use AI, we are complicit in the system. The film does not accuse, but it does hold a mirror. And that mirror is transformative.

Conclusion 

Humans in the Loop makes visible what digital capitalism wants to hide : the human labour that makes AI possible. Through its visual language, narrative structure, and emotional depth, the film challenges us to see the workers behind the technology and to question the systems that exploit them. It is a film that creates empathy, provokes critique, and opens the door to transformation. In a world where AI is celebrated as the future, the film reminds us that the future is built on the present : and the present, for workers like Nehma, is a place of invisible struggle.

References: Bordwell & Thompson (2019); Vighi (2019); Cave et al. (2023); Barad (2026); Anjum (2026).


TASK 3 : Film Form, Structure & Digital Culture

"Between Forest and Screen: Film Form, Digital Culture, and the Philosophy of Human-AI Interaction in Humans in the Loop"


Introduction

Aranya Sahay's Humans in the Loop (2024) is not just a film about AI : it is a film that uses the language of cinema itself to make a philosophical argument about digital culture and human-AI interaction. The way the film is shot, edited, and designed with sound creates meaning that goes beyond the story. This essay analyses how film form and cinematic devices : camera techniques, editing, sequencing, and sound : convey the film's philosophical concerns.


1. Natural Imagery versus Digital Spaces

The most powerful formal choice in the film is the visual opposition between two spaces: the forest and the screen.

The forest is filmed with handheld cameras that move organically, following the curves of paths, the flow of water, and the movement of people. The light is natural : dappled sunlight through trees, the warm glow of fire during rituals, the soft blue of dawn. These images are rich in texture and depth. They suggest a world that is three-dimensional, interconnected, and alive.

The digital workspace is filmed very differently. The camera is often static or moves in controlled, mechanical patterns. The light is artificial : the cold glow of screens, fluorescent tubes. The images are flat : screens within screens, rectangular frames within rectangular frames. This visual flatness is a deliberate comment on how digital technology reduces the complexity of the real world.

🎬 TWO VISUAL CODES : FOREST vs. SCREEN

Element 🌳 Forest Code πŸ’» Digital Code
Camera Handheld, organic movement. Following curves of paths, flow of water. Static or controlled, mechanical patterns.
Light Natural : dappled sunlight, warm fire glow, soft blue dawn. Artificial : cold screen glow, fluorescent tubes.
Depth Rich texture and depth. Three-dimensional, interconnected, alive. Flat. Screens within screens. Rectangles within rectangles.
Sound Complex, layered : birds, insects, wind, water, ritual music. Minimal, mechanical : mouse click, key tap, computer hum.
Signifies Life, knowledge, community, depth Reduction, isolation, alienation, control

From a structuralist / film semiotic perspective, these two visual systems function as codes : systems of signs that produce meaning. The forest code signifies life, knowledge, community, and depth. The digital code signifies reduction, isolation, alienation, and control. The meaning of the film emerges from the tension between these two codes (Number Analytics, 2023).

As Deleuze (1983) argues in Cinema 1: The Movement Image, cinema creates philosophical ideas through movement and image, not just through dialogue or plot. Humans in the Loop is an excellent example of this : its philosophy is in its images.


2. Camera Techniques and Framing

The film's camera work is carefully designed to communicate meaning:

πŸ“Έ CAMERA TECHNIQUES AS MEANING

πŸŒ„ Wide Shots (Forest)

Used in forest scenes to show the vastness and interconnectedness of the natural world. Multiple elements : trees, animals, people, water : all in the same frame, suggesting an ecological worldview where everything is related.

πŸ‘€ Close-ups (Workspace)

Used in labelling scenes to show isolation and confinement. Nehma's face fills the frame, separated from everything else. The screen she looks at is a small rectangle within the larger rectangle of the cinema frame : a visual metaphor for the narrowing of perception that technology imposes.

πŸ‘️ Point-of-View Shots

Used when Nehma looks at the screen, placing the viewer in her position. This technique creates identification : we see what she sees, and we feel the inadequacy of the AI's categories.

These techniques are not random; they are part of a formalist strategy : using the specific tools of cinema (camera angle, frame size, shot duration) to create meaning. As Bordwell and Thompson (2019) explain, formalist analysis focuses on how the film's techniques shape the viewer's experience.


3. Editing and Sequencing

The film's editing is one of its most philosophically significant elements:

The juxtaposition of forest scenes and workspace scenes creates a dialectical structure. Each cut between the two worlds asks the viewer to compare them : to think about what is gained and what is lost when human knowledge enters the digital system.

The pacing shifts between the two worlds. Forest scenes have a slower rhythm : longer takes, fewer cuts, allowing the viewer to absorb the richness of the environment. Workspace scenes have a faster rhythm : quick cuts, abrupt transitions, suggesting the pressure and monotony of digital labour.

This contrast in pacing is not just aesthetic; it is philosophical. It suggests that the natural world operates on a different temporality than the digital world. The forest has its own time : seasonal, cyclical, patient. The digital workspace operates on clock time : measured, urgent, linear. The film suggests that something valuable is lost when human beings are forced to live in digital time rather than natural time.

From a narrative theory perspective, the sequencing of events is also significant. The film does not follow a conventional three-act structure (setup, conflict, resolution). Instead, it uses a circular or episodic structure : returning again and again to the same tension between forest and screen. This repetition itself is meaningful: it suggests that the problem is systemic, not individual, and that there is no easy resolution.


4. Sound Design

The sound design of the film works on multiple levels:

πŸ”Š SOUND DESIGN : TWO ACOUSTIC WORLDS

🌿

Forest Soundscape

Complex and layered : birds, insects, wind, water, human voices, ritual music. Sounds overlap, creating a rich acoustic environment mirroring the ecological richness of the visual images.

πŸ–±️

Workspace Soundscape

Minimal and mechanical : mouse click, key tap, computer fan hum, distant workers. Acoustic flatness mirrors the visual flatness of the digital space.

The transition between these two soundscapes is often abrupt, creating a sonic shock that the viewer feels physically. This is an example of what sound design theorists call diegetic contrast : using the differences between sound environments to create meaning.

Occasionally, the film may blend the two soundscapes : a moment where forest sounds intrude into the workspace, or digital sounds intrude into the forest. These moments of sonic overlap suggest that the boundary between the two worlds is not firm : they bleed into each other, and Nehma lives in both.


5. Aesthetic Choices and the Viewer's Experience

The overall aesthetic of the film creates a specific viewer experience:

🎨 AESTHETIC STRATEGY : COMFORT vs. DISCOMFORT

🌳 Forest Scenes : Comfort

Create a feeling of peace, belonging, and meaning. The viewer relaxes, breathes, and connects with the natural world through the screen.

πŸ’» Workspace Scenes : Discomfort

Create a feeling of tension, isolation, and frustration. The viewer becomes uncomfortable, restless : mirroring Nehma's own experience.

πŸ”„ Alternation : Deliberate Strategy

The film does not want the viewer to be passive. It wants the viewer to feel the problem : to experience, even briefly, the alienation of digital labour and the richness of what is being lost.

From a phenomenological perspective (drawing on Bazin, 1967), the film uses cinema's unique ability to capture reality to make the viewer present in both worlds. The forest scenes feel real because they are shot with respect for the real : real light, real sound, real people. The workspace scenes feel oppressive because they are shot with an awareness of how technology mediates reality.


Conclusion

Humans in the Loop is a film that thinks through its form. Every camera angle, every cut, every sound carries philosophical meaning. The interplay of natural imagery and digital spaces communicates a deep concern about what happens when human knowledge is reduced to data, when forests become images on a screen, and when human labour becomes invisible. The film's aesthetic choices do not merely illustrate its themes : they embody them. In this sense, Sahay's film is not just a narrative about AI; it is a cinematic argument : an argument made not with words but with images, sounds, and rhythms.

References: Deleuze (1983); Bazin (1967); Bordwell & Thompson (2019); Number Analytics (2023); Sui & Wang (2025).


πŸ“š Complete References

Alonso, D. V. (2026). Imagining AI futures in mainstream cinema: Socio-technical narratives and social imaginaries. AI & Society. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-026-02880-7

Anjum, N. (2026). Aranya Sahay's Humans in the Loop and the politics of AI data labelling. The Federal. https://thefederal.com/films/aranya-sahay-humans-in-the-loop-oscar-adivasi-data-labelling-jharkhand-ai-tribal-216946

Barad, D. (2026, January). Humans in the loop: Exploring AI, labour and digital culture [Blog post]. https://blog.dilipbarad.com/2026/01/humans-in-loop-film-review-exploring-ai.html

Bazin, A. (1967). What is cinema? (Vol. 1). University of California Press.

Bordwell, D., & Thompson, K. (2019). Film art: An introduction (12th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.

Cave, S., Dihal, K., Drage, E., & McInerney, K. (2023). Shuri in the sea of dudes: The cultural construction of the AI engineer in popular film, 1920-2020. In Feminist AI (pp. 65-82). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780192889898.003.0005

Deleuze, G. (1983). Cinema 1: The movement image. University of Minnesota Press.

FrΓ­as, C. L. (2024). The paradox of artificial intelligence in cinema. Cultura Digital, 2(1), 5-25. https://doi.org/10.23882/cdig.240999

GΓΆker, D. (2025). Human-like artificial intelligence in Indian cinema. International Journal of Cultural and Social Studies, 11(2), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.46442/intjcss.1799907

Haris, M. J., et al. (2023). Identifying gender bias in blockbuster movies through the lens of machine learning. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 10, 94. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-01576-3

Indian Express Editorial. (2026). Humans in the Loop: Technology, AI and digital lives. The Indian Express.

McDonald, K. (2023). Film theory: The basics (2nd ed.). Routledge.

Mehrotra, K. (2022). Human Touch. Fifty Two (52).

Number Analytics. (2023). Film theory essentials: Key concepts and frameworks. https://www.numberanalytics.com/blog/film-theory-essentials

Sahay, A. (Director). (2024). Humans in the loop [Film]. India.

Shepherdson, C., Simpson, J., & Utterson, A. (Eds.). (2004). Film theory: Critical concepts in media and cultural studies (Vols. 1-4). Routledge.

Sui, Z., & Wang, S. (2025). Dogme 25: Media primitivism and new auteurism in the age of artificial intelligence. Frontiers in Communication, 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2025.1659731

Vighi, F. (2019). Critical theory and film: Rethinking ideology through film noir. Bloomsbury Academic India.

Wikipedia. (n.d.). Humans in the Loop (film). Retrieved February 15, 2026.

Yu, Y. (2025). The reel deal? An experimental analysis of perception bias and AI film pitches. Journal of Cultural Economics, 49, 281-300. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10824-025-09534-4


πŸ“Έ Film Screening at Department of English, MKBU

Film Screening - Group Photo MKBU

Film Screening of Humans in the Loop at Department of English, MKBU


🎬 KEY INSIGHTS FROM THE FILM

πŸ€–

AI Bias
is cultural, not technical

🌿

Indigenous Knowledge
is erased by algorithms

πŸ‘️

Invisible Labour
makes AI possible

πŸŽ₯

Cinema
as political resistance

🎬 "Behind every algorithm, there is a human being : and that human being's knowledge, culture, and dignity matter." 🎬


This blog presents a post-viewing reflective analysis of Aranya Sahay's Humans in the Loop (2024), exploring how the film reveals AI bias, epistemic violence, invisible labour, and data colonialism through the story of an Adivasi data-labeller in Jharkhand.