From Page to Screen: A Critical Study of R. K. Narayan's An Astrologer's Day
Professor's Blog for Background Reading: Click here
Original Text of An Astrologer's Day: Click here
📖 BLOG OVERVIEW — PRE-VIEWING AND POST-VIEWING TASKS
Introduction
R. K. Narayan and the story
Setting
Light, shadow and crowds
Plot and Characters
From routine to revelation
Film Adaptation
Page to screen analysis
Themes and Irony
Fate, guilt, appearance vs reality
.png)
NotebookLM Mind Map: An Astrologer's Day by R. K. Narayan
Short-Film Adaptation: The adaptation is provided below for a comparative understanding of how Narayan's written narrative is transformed into a visual and cinematic form.
An Astrologer's Day — Short Film Adaptation | Pocket Films
Introduction to R. K. Narayan
R. K. Narayan (1906–2001)
Rasipuram Krishnaswami Narayan (1906–2001) was one of the most significant writers in Indian English literature and, along with Mulk Raj Anand and Raja Rao, contributed greatly to the development of Indian writing in English. His literary style is marked by simplicity, realism, humour, irony, and keen observation of everyday life.
A major part of Narayan's fiction is set in the fictional South Indian town of Malgudi, through which he presents ordinary characters and their social, moral, and psychological experiences. His works frequently explore themes such as fate, identity, morality, human relationships, and the unpredictability of life.
His notable works include Swami and Friends, The Guide, The English Teacher, and The Man-Eater of Malgudi. His short story "An Astrologer's Day" exemplifies his distinctive narrative technique, combining irony, suspense, fate, guilt, and appearance versus reality to reveal the complex psychology of its protagonist.
Pre-Viewing Task: An Astrologer's Day by R. K. Narayan
Introduction
R. K. Narayan's An Astrologer's Day is a compact yet psychologically complex short story that combines realism, humour, irony, suspense, and an unexpected revelation. At first, the narrative appears to describe an ordinary day in the professional life of a street astrologer. Gradually, however, Narayan reveals that beneath the astrologer's carefully constructed public identity lies a disturbing personal history.
Through the chance encounter between the astrologer and Guru Nayak, Narayan explores the relationship between appearance and reality, past and present, guilt and relief, fate and coincidence. The artistic effectiveness of the story arises particularly from its carefully designed setting, economical plot, psychologically convincing characters, suspenseful structure, ironic narrative style, and interconnected themes.
Setting: A World of Light, Shadow, and Crowds
The story is set primarily in and around Town Hall Park in an unnamed South Indian town. The astrologer conducts his business beneath the branches of a spreading tamarind tree beside a narrow and crowded road. The place is full of commercial activity, with medicine sellers, sellers of stolen hardware and junk, magicians, an auctioneer, and a fried-groundnut vendor. A continuous crowd moves through this environment, providing the astrologer with potential customers.
Narayan makes particularly effective use of light and darkness in constructing the setting. The marketplace has no proper municipal lighting. Instead, it is illuminated by shop lights, gaslights, naked flares, and old cycle lamps, producing a "bewildering criss-cross of light rays and moving shadows."
The physical setting has an important symbolic function. The semi-darkness corresponds to the mystery surrounding the astrologer himself. He appears to possess supernatural knowledge, while the reality of his profession and his past remains concealed. Significantly, the darkness also helps him maintain his professional disguise because he never originally intended to become an astrologer and possesses no genuine knowledge of astrology.
Thus, light and darkness become metaphors for knowledge and ignorance, revelation and concealment, appearance and reality. The setting is therefore not merely a background to the action; it contributes directly to the meaning and suspense of the story.
🌆 THE SYMBOLIC ROLE OF LIGHT AND DARKNESS
💡 Light — Knowledge, revelation, the truth of the astrologer's past being brought into view
🌑 Darkness — Concealment, mystery, the astrologer's hidden identity and guilt
🕯️ The Cheroot Match — The pivotal moment of partial illumination that triggers recognition and suspense
🌃 After Guru Nayak Leaves — "Darkness and silence" — the marketplace returns to concealment after the brief encounter with truth
Plot: From Routine to Revelation
The plot follows the classical movement from an apparently ordinary situation towards conflict, climax, and resolution.
At the beginning, the astrologer is shown conducting his regular business. Although he presents himself as a professional astrologer, he actually knows nothing about the stars. His success depends upon experience, observation, psychological insight, and shrewd guesswork. He allows customers to speak first and uses the information they reveal to construct convincing predictions. Narayan explains that the astrologer understands common human problems involving "marriage, money, and the tangles of human ties."
The routine changes dramatically when a stranger approaches him at the end of the day and challenges his abilities. The astrologer initially accepts the challenge but becomes frightened when the stranger lights a cheroot and his face becomes visible in the matchlight.
The stranger, later identified as Guru Nayak, refuses to allow the astrologer to escape the consultation. He wants to know whether he will succeed in finding the man he has been searching for.
At this point, the astrologer gives astonishingly precise information: Guru Nayak had once been attacked with a knife, thrown into a well, and left for dead. Guru Nayak confirms that he survived only because a passer-by happened to discover him.
The apparent miracle is subsequently revealed to have a rational explanation. The astrologer knows the details because he himself was Guru Nayak's attacker.
To protect himself, the astrologer tells Guru Nayak that his attacker has already died and advises him to return to his village and never travel southward again. Guru Nayak accepts the astrologer's words and leaves.
The final revelation occurs when the astrologer reaches home. He tells his wife that he had believed throughout his adult life that he had killed a man. Seeing Guru Nayak alive has therefore removed a tremendous psychological burden. He explains that this incident was the reason he had originally fled his village, settled elsewhere, and married.
📊 PLOT STRUCTURE: ROUTINE TO REVELATION
Routine
Ordinary working day
Challenge
Guru Nayak arrives
Recognition
Astrologer recognises him
Suspense
Tension builds
Revelation
The truth exposed
Relief
Psychological release
Characters
The Astrologer
The astrologer is the protagonist and the most complex character in the story. He is intelligent, observant, resourceful, deceptive, fearful, and psychologically burdened by his past.
His physical appearance is deliberately constructed to attract customers. Sacred ash and vermilion cover his forehead, while a saffron-coloured turban, dark whiskers, sparkling eyes, cowrie shells, mystic charts, and other professional objects create an impressive appearance. His customers interpret the sharpness of his eyes as a sign of prophetic power, although it is actually the result of his continual search for customers.
Narayan therefore establishes a contrast between what the astrologer appears to be and what he actually is.
His intelligence lies not in astrology but in his ability to understand people. Years of experience have taught him how to identify universal human anxieties and transform them into convincing predictions.
However, his encounter with Guru Nayak reveals another dimension of his personality. Beneath the confident professional exterior exists a man haunted by the belief that he once committed murder. His fear during the encounter indicates that he has never completely escaped his past.
The astrologer is therefore neither simply a fraud nor simply a victim of circumstances. He is a morally ambiguous and psychologically convincing human being whose actions are shaped by survival, fear, guilt, and intelligence.
Guru Nayak
Guru Nayak is the stranger whose appearance creates the central conflict. He is aggressive, suspicious, persistent, and revenge-driven.
His determination is evident when the astrologer tries to withdraw from the consultation. Guru Nayak refuses and declares:
"Challenge is challenge. Go on."
His principal objective is to find the person who attacked him and take revenge. He admits that he has repeatedly left home in search of the attacker because he wants to kill him.
Guru Nayak consequently functions as more than an antagonist. He is a catalyst who forces the astrologer to confront his suppressed past. Ironically, he spends years searching for his attacker without realising that the very astrologer sitting before him is the man he seeks.
📊 THE ASTROLOGER vs. GURU NAYAK: CHARACTER COMPARISON
| Aspect | The Astrologer | Guru Nayak |
|---|---|---|
| Role | Protagonist | Antagonist / Catalyst |
| Dominant trait | Deceptive, fearful, guilt-ridden | Aggressive, persistent, revenge-driven |
| Represents | Guilt and concealment | Return of the past, desire for revenge |
| Knowledge | Knows the truth; uses it to deceive | Seeks the truth; ultimately deceived |
| Outcome | Psychological relief | Returns home, search abandoned |
Structure: Suspense and Delayed Revelation
The structure of An Astrologer's Day is compact and carefully controlled. It may be represented as:
Exposition → Encounter → Conflict → Climax → Revelation → Resolution
The exposition introduces the astrologer, his appearance, profession, working methods, and marketplace environment.
The encounter begins when Guru Nayak arrives just as the astrologer is preparing to leave.
The conflict develops through Guru Nayak's challenge and the astrologer's increasingly obvious discomfort.
The climax occurs when the astrologer reveals precise details about Guru Nayak's attempted murder.
The revelation comes when the reader discovers the hidden relationship between the two men.
Finally, the resolution occurs when the astrologer returns home and tells his wife that the man he believed he had killed is still alive.
Narayan's most effective structural device is delayed revelation. The author does not immediately explain why the astrologer becomes frightened after seeing Guru Nayak. Instead, information is gradually released.
This creates suspense while simultaneously preparing the story's surprise ending. The revelation at the conclusion forces the reader to reinterpret the entire encounter. What initially appeared to be an extraordinary demonstration of astrological knowledge becomes an act of personal memory and self-preservation.
Style: Simplicity, Irony, Humour, and Psychological Realism
Narayan's narrative style is characterised by simplicity, precision, humour, irony, realistic observation, and economy of expression. He begins with the ordinary details of marketplace life but gradually transforms them into a psychologically tense situation.
Irony
Irony is perhaps the most important stylistic feature of the story. The astrologer makes his living by predicting other people's futures, although:
"He was as much a stranger to the stars as were his innocent customers."
The irony becomes even more powerful when Guru Nayak appears. For perhaps the first time, the astrologer gives extraordinarily accurate information about someone's past — not because astrology has suddenly worked, but because he personally created that past.
Humour
Narayan also employs gentle humour. The groundnut vendor, for example, invents grand names for the same product, calling it "Bombay Ice-Cream," "Delhi Almond," and "Raja's Delicacy." The astrologer's professional techniques are similarly humorous because his statements are general enough to apply to almost anybody.
The humour, however, gradually gives way to suspense and psychological seriousness.
Realism
The detailed description of vendors, crowds, lights, noises, bargaining, domestic concerns, money, and ordinary family life creates a convincing social world. Narayan's realism emerges through close observation of everyday Indian life rather than elaborate description.
Symbolism
The imagery of light and darkness operates symbolically throughout the narrative. The astrologer's hidden past belongs metaphorically to darkness, while his encounter with Guru Nayak brings that past temporarily into the light. Significantly, after Guru Nayak departs, the green shaft of light disappears and the marketplace is left in "darkness and silence."
Major Themes
🎭 MAJOR THEMES IN AN ASTROLOGER'S DAY
Appearance vs Reality
The fraud beneath the costume
Guilt and Release
Years of psychological burden
Fate and Coincidence
The unpredictability of life
Inescapability of Past
Past shapes the present
Deception and Survival
Moral ambiguity of fraud
Appearance versus Reality
The central theme of the story is the contrast between appearance and reality. The astrologer appears to possess supernatural knowledge but actually relies upon observation and guesswork. His costume creates an impression of authority that does not correspond to his real knowledge.
The same pattern operates during the encounter with Guru Nayak. What appears to be a supernatural prediction is actually the astrologer's knowledge of his own past.
Guilt and Psychological Release
The story is also fundamentally concerned with guilt. The astrologer has spent years believing that he murdered Guru Nayak. His statement, "I thought I had the blood of a man on my hands all these years," reveals that the incident has remained a hidden psychological burden.
Discovering that Guru Nayak is alive therefore gives him tremendous relief. The ending represents not legal or moral absolution but psychological release from the belief that he is a murderer.
Fate and Coincidence
Fate is treated with considerable irony. The astrologer claims professionally to understand destiny, yet he cannot predict that his own past will suddenly appear before him in the form of Guru Nayak.
The accidental meeting suggests the unpredictable power of coincidence and raises an important question: Is human life controlled by fate, or do people interpret coincidence as fate?
The Inescapability of the Past
The astrologer physically escapes his village and establishes an entirely new life. Nevertheless, he cannot completely escape his past.
Guru Nayak's unexpected appearance demonstrates that geographical escape does not necessarily produce psychological escape. The past continues to influence the astrologer's identity until he is unexpectedly forced to confront it.
Deception and Survival
Deception is another important theme. The astrologer deceives his customers about his knowledge, and he deceives Guru Nayak by telling him that his attacker is dead.
However, Narayan complicates the moral issue by presenting deception as connected with survival. The astrologer's professional deception enables him to support his family, while his deception of Guru Nayak protects his present life.
Conclusion (Pre-Viewing)
R. K. Narayan's An Astrologer's Day is an excellent example of how a short story can achieve considerable thematic and psychological depth through a simple narrative situation. The crowded and semi-dark marketplace provides an appropriate setting for a protagonist whose identity itself exists between appearance and reality. The encounter with Guru Nayak transforms an ordinary working day into a confrontation with the astrologer's hidden past.
Through delayed revelation, irony, humour, realistic description, symbolism, and psychological insight, Narayan gradually changes the reader's understanding of the protagonist. The astrologer begins as an apparently comic fraud but emerges as a complex individual burdened by guilt and struggling to protect the life he has constructed.
Ultimately, the story explores appearance versus reality, guilt and relief, fate and coincidence, deception and survival, and the persistent influence of the past upon the present. Its greatest irony lies in the fact that a man who pretends to understand other people's destinies is finally confronted by the unpredictable consequences of his own.
Post-Viewing Tasks: An Astrologer's Day by R. K. Narayan
Introduction
The screening of the film adaptation of R. K. Narayan's An Astrologer's Day provides an opportunity to examine the relationship between a literary text and its cinematic representation. Narayan's original short story is built around a simple but highly effective situation: a street astrologer encounters Guru Nayak, a man whom he had once attempted to kill. The encounter gradually reveals the astrologer's hidden past and ultimately releases him from the burden of believing that he had committed murder.
The film translates this narrative into a visual form through setting, performance, lighting, dialogue, facial expressions, sound, and dramatic pauses. Although certain details are modified to suit the cinematic medium, the central narrative and thematic concerns remain substantially intact.
1. How faithful is the movie to the original short story?
The movie is substantially faithful to R. K. Narayan's original short story, particularly in relation to the central plot, major characters, conflict, climax, and resolution. It preserves the fundamental narrative structure of the original text while making certain changes necessary for cinematic presentation.
The original story begins with the astrologer sitting beneath a tamarind tree in the Town Hall Park. He attracts customers through his costume, astrological equipment, and apparent knowledge of human problems. The film similarly establishes his professional identity and his public image as an astrologer.
The central encounter with Guru Nayak is retained as the major turning point. In both the story and the film, Guru Nayak challenges the astrologer and seeks information about the man who had previously attacked him. The astrologer gradually recognises him and realises that his own past has returned unexpectedly.
The most important revelation is also preserved: the astrologer knows the details of Guru Nayak's attack because he himself was responsible for it. What initially appears to be supernatural astrological knowledge is actually knowledge based on personal experience.
The film also retains the crucial deception through which the astrologer protects himself. He tells Guru Nayak that the man who attacked him is dead. In the original story, he even specifies that the man was crushed under a lorry. Guru Nayak accepts the information and abandons his search.
The final domestic scene is equally important. The astrologer tells his wife that he had spent years believing that he had killed a man and that the discovery of Guru Nayak's survival has relieved him of a tremendous burden.
However, the film is not a word-for-word reproduction of the story. This is inevitable because literature and cinema employ different narrative techniques. Narayan can spend several paragraphs describing the marketplace, the astrologer's thoughts, and the behaviour of his customers. A filmmaker must communicate these things through images, performance, sound, editing, and dialogue.
Therefore, the film should be considered a faithful adaptation rather than an exact reproduction. It preserves the spirit, narrative framework, central irony, and psychological conflict of Narayan's story while adapting certain details to the requirements of cinema.
Critical Evaluation
The adaptation is successful because it does not unnecessarily alter the fundamental meaning of the original. Its greatest fidelity lies not in reproducing every sentence or detail but in preserving the central dramatic situation and thematic essence of the story.
2. After watching the movie, have your perception of the short story, characters, or situations changed?
Yes. The film changes and deepens my perception of the original story, particularly my understanding of the astrologer as a psychologically complex character.
While reading the story, the astrologer may initially appear to be merely a clever fraud who earns money by deceiving innocent customers. Narayan's narrator even emphasises the irony that he is as much a stranger to the stars as his customers.
The film, however, makes his emotional condition more visible. His facial expressions, nervous gestures, pauses, changes in voice, and physical reactions reveal the anxiety that lies beneath his professional confidence.
His encounter with Guru Nayak therefore becomes more psychologically intense on screen. The astrologer is not simply afraid of being exposed as a fraud; he is frightened because he recognises a man from the most disturbing episode of his past.
This changes our interpretation of his character. We begin to understand that his decision to leave his village and create a new life was connected with his guilt and fear.
Guru Nayak's character also becomes more vivid in the film. His aggressive manner and determination to find his attacker make the danger confronting the astrologer more immediate. In the written story, his determination is communicated primarily through dialogue and narration; in the film, it is reinforced through acting and visual presence.
The film therefore encourages us to see the two men not simply as protagonist and antagonist, but as two individuals connected by a violent event from the past.
The astrologer represents guilt and concealment, while Guru Nayak represents the return of the past and the desire for revenge.
Thus, the film changes my perception by making the psychological dimensions of the story more immediate and emotionally accessible.
3. Do you feel 'aesthetic delight' while watching the movie? If yes, exactly when did it happen?
Yes, the film provides aesthetic delight, particularly through its use of atmosphere, lighting, visual composition, suspense, and acting.
The most aesthetically effective moment for me is the scene in which Guru Nayak lights his cheroot and the astrologer gets a clear glimpse of his face.
This moment is important because the lighting is not merely decorative. It becomes a narrative device. The partial illumination of Guru Nayak's face creates suspense and anticipates the revelation of his identity.
The contrast between light and darkness is particularly meaningful because it corresponds to the thematic opposition between knowledge and concealment.
Another moment of aesthetic delight occurs during the intense consultation between the astrologer and Guru Nayak. The gradual revelation of the attack, the astrologer's nervousness, and Guru Nayak's increasing confidence create a carefully controlled dramatic atmosphere.
The final scene with the astrologer's wife also creates a different kind of aesthetic effect. Unlike the tense marketplace encounter, the domestic scene is quieter and more intimate. The astrologer's confession allows the audience to experience the emotional release that concludes the narrative.
Thus, the aesthetic delight of the film does not depend merely upon beautiful images. It arises from the way visual and dramatic techniques contribute to meaning.
Critical Point
The film demonstrates that aesthetic experience can emerge from the combination of form and content. Lighting, acting, silence, dialogue, and setting are aesthetically effective because they reinforce the psychological and thematic structure of the story.
4. Does screening of the movie help you in better understanding the short story?
Yes, watching the movie significantly helps in understanding the short story, particularly its setting, characterisation, suspense, and psychological dimensions.
The written story contains a detailed description of the marketplace. Narayan describes the crowd, vendors, artificial lighting, and the astrologer's position beneath the tamarind tree. The film makes this environment immediately visible.
Similarly, the astrologer's emotional reactions become easier to understand through visual performance. His nervousness when Guru Nayak appears is more immediately perceptible when expressed through facial expressions and body language.
The film also clarifies the dramatic significance of the encounter. While reading, the revelation unfolds through narration and dialogue. In the film, the audience can observe the changing relationship between the two characters through their physical behaviour and expressions.
The screening therefore helps the viewer understand that the astrologer's apparently supernatural knowledge is actually based on memory and personal experience.
The film also makes the story's major irony more accessible:
The astrologer who claims to understand other people's futures cannot escape the consequences of his own past.
However, the film should not replace the original text. The short story provides greater access to Narayan's narrative voice, irony, descriptive details, and psychological commentary. The film and the story therefore complement each other.
The film functions as a visual interpretation of the literary text. Reading provides the narrative and linguistic richness, while viewing provides visual, emotional, and performative understanding.
5. Was there any particular scene or moment in the story that you think was perfect?
The most effective scene is the encounter between the astrologer and Guru Nayak, especially the moment when the astrologer begins revealing details about Guru Nayak's past.
This scene is structurally perfect because several elements converge simultaneously:
⭐ ELEMENTS THAT MAKE THE ENCOUNTER SCENE PERFECT
⚡ Suspense — The audience does not know yet what connects the two men
🎭 Irony — The astrologer's "prediction" is actually personal memory
🔍 Character Revelation — The full complexity of both men becomes visible
😨 Psychological Conflict — Fear, guilt, and self-preservation collide
😱 Danger — The astrologer's life could be destroyed at any moment
😲 Surprise — The revelation reframes everything the audience has seen
The astrologer initially appears to be performing another ordinary astrological consultation. Gradually, however, the viewer realises that he knows far more than an ordinary astrologer could possibly know.
When he tells Guru Nayak that he had been attacked with a knife and thrown into a well, the tension reaches its highest point. Guru Nayak confirms the information, making the astrologer's supposed supernatural power appear convincing.
The real irony is known to the audience: the astrologer is not predicting the past; he is remembering it.
The final conversation with his wife is another particularly effective moment. His statement that he has carried the belief that he had "the blood of a man" on his hands for years reveals the emotional significance of the entire encounter.
Thus, if one scene has to be identified as the most successful, it would be the Guru Nayak encounter, because it simultaneously serves as the dramatic, psychological, and thematic centre of the narrative.
6. If you were the director, what changes would you make while remaking the movie?
If I were directing a new adaptation of An Astrologer's Day, I would preserve the essential plot and Narayan's characteristic simplicity, but I would introduce a few carefully controlled cinematic changes.
1. A Brief Flashback
I would include a short flashback showing the astrologer's earlier encounter with Guru Nayak.
The flashback would not reveal everything immediately. It would be fragmented and visually suggestive so that the audience gradually understands the relationship between the two men.
This would strengthen the psychological dimension of the story while preserving the original's suspense.
2. Greater Use of Light and Shadow
I would make the story's recurring imagery of light and darkness more visually prominent.
The astrologer's workplace could remain partially illuminated, symbolising his uncertain identity. Guru Nayak's face could initially remain partly hidden in darkness, with his identity becoming clearer as the conversation develops.
This would visually reinforce the movement from concealment to revelation.
3. More Attention to the Astrologer's Psychological State
I would use close-up shots of the astrologer's face during the encounter with Guru Nayak. His eyes, breathing, hesitation, and nervous movements could communicate his fear without excessive dialogue.
This would preserve Narayan's psychological subtlety while taking advantage of cinema's visual possibilities.
4. Strengthen the Final Domestic Scene
I would give slightly greater importance to the conversation between the astrologer and his wife.
The contrast between the wife's ordinary concerns about money and food and the astrologer's extraordinary psychological revelation is one of the most interesting aspects of the story.
The scene could therefore end with a quiet image of the astrologer finally resting peacefully, suggesting the release of his long-carried burden.
5. Avoid Excessive Melodrama
Most importantly, I would avoid unnecessary action, exaggerated violence, romantic subplots, or melodramatic additions.
Narayan's strength lies in understatement. The power of the story comes from a simple encounter that unexpectedly exposes an entire hidden past.
Therefore, the remake should retain the author's economy, irony, humour, and psychological subtlety.
🎬 IF I WERE THE DIRECTOR: FIVE KEY CHANGES
Flashback
Fragmented, suggestive
Light and Shadow
Symbolic cinematography
Close-ups
Psychological depth
Domestic Scene
Stronger ending
No Melodrama
Preserve understatement
Conclusion
The film adaptation of An Astrologer's Day is largely successful because it preserves the fundamental narrative and thematic structure of R. K. Narayan's original short story while translating its literary qualities into the language of cinema.
The film deepens our understanding of the astrologer by making his fear and guilt visually perceptible. It also makes the marketplace setting, the encounter with Guru Nayak, and the final emotional release more immediate.
The greatest aesthetic and dramatic achievement lies in the encounter scene, where the astrologer's apparent supernatural powers are gradually revealed to be the product of personal knowledge. This produces the central irony of the story: the astrologer is able to "predict" the past because he himself is responsible for it.
If remade, the film could benefit from a restrained flashback, stronger use of light and shadow, closer attention to the protagonist's psychological reactions, and a more developed final domestic scene. Nevertheless, any adaptation should preserve Narayan's essential qualities of simplicity, irony, realism, humour, and psychological subtlety.
Ultimately, the film and the short story complement one another. The story provides the richness of Narayan's language and narrative irony, while the film provides a visual and emotional interpretation of the same material. Together, they demonstrate how the same narrative can acquire new meanings when transferred from page to screen.
Decoding An Astrologer's Day: Literary and Cinematic Analysis
Here is the Video-overview of this blog:
Video: Overview of An Astrologer's Day by R. K. Narayan
Here is the Presentation of this blog:
Slide Presentation: From Page to Screen — An Astrologer's Day by R. K. Narayan
📚 References
"An Astrologer's Day — Hindi Short Film." YouTube, uploaded by Pocket Films, directed by Sushant Bhat, 17 June 2017, youtu.be/TkfrjYFQozA. Accessed 5 July 2025.
Narayan, R. K. Malgudi Days. Penguin, 2006.
This blog analyses R. K. Narayan's An Astrologer's Day through literary and cinematic study | MKBU Department of English
No comments:
Post a Comment